Pessimism: The glass is half empty.
Optimism: The glass is half full.
Modern cynicism: Who cares? It’s probably poisoned anyway.
Skepticism: How could you possibly know that?
Platonism: There exists a theoretical form of a glass which is completely full.
Empiricism: Technically, the glass is completely full.
Realism: The glass is just twice as big as it needs to be.
Positivism: How do you know? Have you measured?
Cartesianism: What good would that do? There’s no logic in that.
Stoicism: We should imagine the glass completely empty - to prepare ourselves.
Asceticism: You see, the glass is a distraction from true happiness.
Rationalism: Now, now. Let’s not get emotional.
Kantianism: Someone else can have the glass.
Epicureanism: I’ll take it.
Utilitarianism: But would that really be the most useful? Is that the best use of the glass?
Social Darwinism: The glass belongs to he who is fit enough to take it.
Marxism: You bourgeoisie always reduce the glass to mere money relations.
Charvaka: Not necessarily! That rule may not be universal.
Legalism: You want to talk to me about rules?
Surrealism: Your little arguments are so cute. Penguin stranger melty glass. And a rhinoceros.
Holism: The glass and its contents should be viewed as a composite whole.
Absurdism: Whatever. If that makes you feel better about it.
Deconstructionism: You don’t really mean that.
Socratism: Then what does he mean?
Deconstructionism: You wouldn’t understand.
Classic cynicism: Get that glass out of my sun!
Existentialism: Is the glass?
Solipsism: The glass does not exist.
Nihilism: The glass is dead.
Hedonism: Oh, was I not supposed to drink that!? Well, the glass is empty now.To read more of Riley's work, click here or follow him on Twitter.